Friday, May 31, 2019

A Comparison of Hamlet and The Turn of the Screw :: comparison compare contrast essays

crossroads vs. The Turn of the bash Although settlement and The Turn of the Screw are very different works, both William Shakespeare and Henry crowd together use the themes of love and phantoms to complicate their work. By having these themes, both authors make the readers question and wonder if the accounts the characters are having veridically exist. Are these two main characters, Hamlet and the governess , mentally ill or does the stories explain their actions? The most obvious commonality, between Hamlet and The Turn of the Screw, is the use of pinchs. On one hand, Hamlet speaks with the ghost of his father, Hamlet. When Hamlet firsts sees the ghost he asks, Be thou a spirit of health or goblin damned,/ Bring with thee airs from heaven or blasts from Hell,/ Be thy intents wicked or charitable, (I. 4. 40-42). When Hamlet finally meets the ghost and converses with him, the ghost creates a problem that lasts throughout the whole play. On the other hand, the gove rness sees the two deceased workers, Peter Quint and fly the coop Jessel. These ghosts also create a problem. Speaking with Mrs. Grose, the governess tells her there was a ghost. After Mrs. Grose asks what the ghost wants, the governess says, Heaven forbid The man. He Quint wants to appear to them the children. Are the ghost accepted? Do the children see the ghosts and lie? In both works, love also plays a role. Hamlets love, Ophelia, sees Hamlet at his worse. To make the people around him think hes crazy, Hamlet visits Ophelia and acts mad. When speaking with her father, Ophelia says, Lord Hamlet, with his doublet all unbraced,/ No hat upon his head, his stockings fouled,/ Unaltered , and down-gyvd to his ankles, (II. 1. 77-79). Soon, his mother and the king think Hamlet is insane. Is Hamlet really crazy? In The Turn of the Screw, the ghosts appear to the governess while she is thinking about the master, her infatuation, or his heir, Miles. The governess states, ... the only way to be sure he knew would be to see it, and the kind unprovoked of it, in his the masters handsome face ( jam 23). Suddenly Peter Quint appears in a high window.A Comparison of Hamlet and The Turn of the Screw comparison compare contrast essays Hamlet vs. The Turn of the Screw Although Hamlet and The Turn of the Screw are very different works, both William Shakespeare and Henry James use the themes of love and ghosts to complicate their work. By having these themes, both authors make the readers question and wonder if the accounts the characters are having really exist. Are these two main characters, Hamlet and the governess , mentally ill or does the stories explain their actions? The most obvious commonality, between Hamlet and The Turn of the Screw, is the use of ghosts. On one hand, Hamlet speaks with the ghost of his father, Hamlet. When Hamlet firsts sees the ghost he asks, Be thou a spirit of health or goblin damned,/ Bring with thee airs from he aven or blasts from Hell,/ Be thy intents wicked or charitable, (I. 4. 40-42). When Hamlet finally meets the ghost and converses with him, the ghost creates a problem that lasts throughout the whole play. On the other hand, the governess sees the two deceased workers, Peter Quint and set down Jessel. These ghosts also create a problem. Speaking with Mrs. Grose, the governess tells her there was a ghost. After Mrs. Grose asks what the ghost wants, the governess says, Heaven forbid The man. He Quint wants to appear to them the children. Are the ghost real? Do the children see the ghosts and lie? In both works, love also plays a role. Hamlets love, Ophelia, sees Hamlet at his worse. To make the people around him think hes crazy, Hamlet visits Ophelia and acts mad. When speaking with her father, Ophelia says, Lord Hamlet, with his doublet all unbraced,/ No hat upon his head, his stockings fouled,/ Unaltered , and down-gyvd to his ankles, (II. 1. 77-79). Soon, his mother a nd the king think Hamlet is insane. Is Hamlet really crazy? In The Turn of the Screw, the ghosts appear to the governess while she is thinking about the master, her infatuation, or his heir, Miles. The governess states, ...the only way to be sure he knew would be to see it, and the kind hop out of it, in his the masters handsome face (James 23). Suddenly Peter Quint appears in a high window.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Illusion and Delusion in Conrad’s Lord Jim : A Tale Essay -- Joseph Co

Don Quixote Rides Again Illusion and Delusion in Conrads Lord Jim A TaleYou atomic number 18 an incorrigible, hopeless Don Quixote. Thats what you are. (Conrad1946b, 44) Fifteen-year-old Konrad Korzeniowski (Joseph Conrad) heard theseadmonitory words from the lips of his tutor, a Krakowian college student instructed byhis maternal uncle (Tadeusz Bobrowski) to talk his nephew out of his eccentric desire to begin a seaman. The link between young Conrads desire to become a sailor and therenowned knight of La Mancha is not a fooling one. In his writings, Conrad generalisesthe particular case of his vocation for the sea by pointing to the reading of romances ofadventure as the cause prompting young men to join the marine profession. Thus, forinstance, in the autobiographical work in which the words of dear tutor are quoted (APersonal Record) Conrad refers to Victor Hugos Toilers of the Sea as his first understructure to the sea in literature. (1946b, 72) In Tales of the Sea (1898) anea rlier piece written at a period in which he was already engaged in the composition ofLord Jim A Tale Conrad speaks of how Frederick Marryat and James FenimoreCooper, the creators of sea fiction, influenced so many lives and gave to so many theinitial impulse towards a glorious or a useful career. (1949, 56) Later essays like WellDone (1918) or Geography and Some Explorers (1924) highlight the role played byromances and books of exploration in triggering young mens desire for a life ofadventure at sea, Conrads included. In the latter he calls Nez de Balboa, Tasman,Torres, misrepresent or Franklin the first grown-up friends of my early boyhood and statesthat their nautical feats were an inspiration for him. ... ...Facts They demanded facts for him Jim, as if facts could explainanything (Conrad 1946c, 29) This disavowal of the value of facts sounds is an anomalous one to hearcoming from a third-person teller which, traditionally, was supposed to occupy the objective position of avie w from nowhere specifically. It is important to add that such a statement is made in Chapter 4, at the endof which the third-person narrator gives the floor to Marlow, a first-person narrator subjectively involved inthe story he is telling.11 Needless to comment on the inter-group communication between hepatic diseases and alcoholism.12 It may be argued that the doctors irony and laughter are a sign of nervousness and a omen of the lossof consistency of his self-representation as derived from a scientific practice whose solidity is equallyeroded by the engineers atypical hallucinations.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Free Hamlet Essays: Importance of Minor Characters :: GCSE English Literature Coursework

Importance of Minor Characters in small town A now-dead philosopher once said that people need threesome relationships in lifeconfidant, lover, mentor. Horatio acts as Hamlets confidant, fulfilling that relationship for Hamlet. As a result, we can contrast Hamlets dialogue with Horatio to Hamlets soliloquies. In Act III, Scene 2, lines 65-70 Hamlet tells Horatio about his idea to use the players to prove Cladiuss guilt. There is a play to-night before the king 65One scene of it comes near the circumstanceWhich I have told thee of my fathers deathI prithee, when thou seest that act afoot,Even with the very comment of thy soul surveil mine uncle 70 Hamlet isnt commanding Horatio to do thisthe relationship isnt based on Hamlets princehood. Hamlet has fully told Horatio what he suspects. He has confided in Horatio. From our perspective as readers, this relationship gives us insight into Hamlets state of mind. One great question about Hamlet is whether Hamlet is mad. The things Hamlet tells Horatio indicate that Hamlet is perfectly sane. Hamlet declares (alone) in Act II, Scene 2, line 535-538, Why, what an ass am I This is most brave,/ That I, the boy of the dear murderd,/ Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell,/ Must like a whore unpack my heart with words. These lines alone dont guide on toward or away from madness. But look at it with III, 2, 65-70 in mind. We see him resolve to prove Cladiuss guilt understand the situation as it rattling is and talk with Horatio, telling him how he feels. All these things show Hamlet as rational, calculating, perceptivesane. And we know this because Horatio is there. In Act V, Scene 2, Hamlet stabbed Laertes, watched his mother die, and poured toxicant down his uncles throat. How can we possibly know what Hamlet is thinking, especially because he will soon be dead himself? Horatio the Confidant is there, the good helper who will listen to Hamlet, who would kill himself to follow Hamlet, who vows to devote his life to Hamlets message. Another big question about Hamlet Did Hamlets revenge come at too great a price? Its a judgment call the evidence can be see either way. That there is evidence at all is due to Horatio. In lines 321-328, Hamlet tells Horatio this As thourt a man,Give me the cup let go by heaven, Ill havet.O good Horatio, what a wounded name,

This Is Audie Murphy Essay -- essays research papers

This is Audie Murphys life story. At the tender age of 12, he becomes the head of the family after his father deserts them. He joins the army at the age of 18 and through the course of the war is beautify for valor nine times thus becoming the most decorated combat soldier in World War II. Audie does one of the bravest acts any soldier ever did during the war. He climbs aboard a burning tank wastrel and single handedly keeps the enemy from advancing on his position. He spends almost an hour on top of the tank destroyer until his ammunition is exhausted. Seconds later after come up off the tank destroyer, it explodes. For this action, Audie receives the Medal of Honor. PVT, AUS30 Jun 42PFC, AUS7 May 43CPL, AUS15 Jul 43SGT, AUS13 Dec 43S/SGT, AUS13 Jan 442d LT, AUS14 Oct 441st LT, AUS16 Feb 451st LT, INF, ORC21 Aug 45CAPT, INF, TEX NG (Federal Recognition)14 July 50CAPT, INF, NGUS19 Oct 50MAJ, INF, TEX NG (Federal Recognition)14 Feb 56MAJ, INF, NGUS14 Feb 56MAJ, INF, USAR8 Nov 66SE RVICE Audie L. Murphy enlisted in the Army of the United States, 30 June 1942, at Dallas, Te...

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Analysis of The Astronomers Wife by Kay Boyle :: Astronomers Wife Kay Boyle Essays Papers

Analysis of The Astronomers Wife by Kay BoyleIn the Astronomers Wife by Kay Boyle, something as simple as aconversation with a pipe fitter about a stopped elbow is enough to trigger anawakening in Mrs. Katherine Ames. When Mrs. Ames complete that the plumber was lecture about something she understood (the stopped elbow), she realized thather marital problems were not the result of a division betwwen the sexesinstead, she realized that some men, analogous the plumber, are as pragmatical as sheis, and that some other men, like her husband, scorn people like her becausethey are intellectually inclined. Previous to this discovery, Katherine did notrealize that there were different kinds of men, and whence she did notrealize that she and her husband were mismatched. Furthermore, in her awakening,Mrs. Ames also discovers that she, like the plumber, occupies as valuable aplace in society as the astronomer, for she does the dirty serve to free peoplelike her husband to have time to thin k and to discover.The scene in question takes place after Mrs. Ames has already noticed thatthe plumber has a few physical characteristics that match her own (such asblond hair), and she is talking to him as he descends into the earth. The scenebegins immediately after the plumber says I think something has stopped theelbow, because this phrase was one of the few things that a man has ever saidthat Mrs. Ames has understood. After the plumber has descended into the groundbefore the scene, Mrs. Ames is the lonesome(prenominal) one left. She spends the entireduration of this scene sitting on the grass, silently thinking and revealing herthoughts to the audience.During her course of thinking, Mrs. Ames makes the important discovery thatthere is a solely race of practical people like herself, men and women alike.She knew that when her husband spoke of height, having no sense of it, shecould not picture it nor hear, but strangely enough, when other man whohappened to be a plumer spoke of his work, madness in a fooling shape, as elbowstopped, she saw clearly and well. Mrs Ames finally realized during thesethoughts that these were two men with two different ways of life, and perhapsher way of life suited the plumbers more than the astronomers, in that she toocould identify only with daily concerns. The division between people in hermind was no longer just between men and women it was now the working and thethinking, those who had always gone up, and others who went down, like the

Analysis of The Astronomers Wife by Kay Boyle :: Astronomers Wife Kay Boyle Essays Papers

Analysis of The Astronomers Wife by Kay BoyleIn the Astronomers Wife by Kay Boyle, something as simple as aconversation with a plumber about a stopped elbow is enough to trigger anawakening in Mrs. Katherine Ames. When Mrs. Ames realise that the plumber wastalking about something she understood (the stopped elbow), she realized thather marital problems were not the result of a division betwwen the sexesinstead, she realized that some men, like the plumber, argon as practical as sheis, and that some other men, like her husband, scorn people like her becausethey are intellectually inclined. Previous to this discovery, Katherine did notrealize that at that place were different kinds of men, and thitherfore she did notrealize that she and her husband were mismatched. Furthermore, in her awakening,Mrs. Ames also discovers that she, like the plumber, occupies as valuable aplace in society as the astronomer, for she does the dirty work to free peoplelike her husband to have time to think and to discover.The scene in question takes place afterward Mrs. Ames has already noticed thatthe plumber has a few physical characteristics that match her own (such asblond hair), and she is talking to him as he descends into the earth. The scenebegins immediately after the plumber says I think something has stopped theelbow, because this phrase was one of the few things that a man has ever saidthat Mrs. Ames has understood. After the plumber has descended into the landed estatebefore the scene, Mrs. Ames is the only one left. She spends the entireduration of this scene sitting on the grass, silently thinking and revealing herthoughts to the audience.During her course of thinking, Mrs. Ames makes the important discovery thatthere is a whole race of practical people like herself, men and women alike.She knew that when her husband spoke of height, having no sense of it, shecould not picture it nor hear, precisely strangely enough, when another man whohappened to be a plumer spoke of his work, madness in a daily shape, as elbowstopped, she saw clearly and closely. Mrs Ames finally realized during thesethoughts that these were two men with two different ways of life, and perhapsher way of life suited the plumbers more than the astronomers, in that she toocould put only with daily concerns. The division between people in hermind was no longer just between men and women it was now the working and thethinking, those who had forever and a day gone up, and others who went down, like the

Monday, May 27, 2019

Religion Is Seen as Not Promoting Social Change for Marx and Durkheim. Essay

religious belief is a powerful role in influencing a society and the lives of its members. The sociological traditions of Marx and Durkheim learn righteousness totally differently, yet they both agree that religion is a very important aspect of a society. Durkheim and Marx each had their own definitions of religion. However, we forget learn that they both see an important role that religion plays in a society, as well as the rooms in which society creates and shapes their religions. inappropriate Durkheim and Weber, Marx was not much concerned with the studying religion although his ideas on religion are very influential.For marx religion He further feels that a world that requires conjuring (religion) has something wrong with it. Marx talks most two primary functions of religion in what he calls the real world. First he says that religion is the opium of the people. Marx feels religion provides anaesthesia to the masses. To him, religion is a panache for people to escape f rom some of the suffering in their lives or to somehow feel better despite all of their suffering. Religion deters suffering of the present situations of people.It allows people to put off their suffering because they believe it ordain be taken care of in heaven, or where ever, after they die. And as it would follow, religion helps people put more hope into the year after. People who are religious really do believe life will be better for them after they die. Also religion helps to maintain the oppression of the lower classed people by the people who make up the upper classes. The number primary function of religion in a society, according to Karl Marx, is that it is the sigh of the oppressed creature.Religion brings with it a safety value. People end up existence lulled into the protection religion seems to offer them, and people do feel the need to feel and be safe. Religion also gives people an opportunity to complain about the ways of the world. The world is not the way relig ion says it should be and therefore people complain about the way it actually is, as a way of feeling like a good member of their chosen religion. Religion allows people to acknowledge the dehumanized state of their lives.It helps people to see the horrible way in which we are in and it helps keep us in this horrible way. We realize through religion that we are not commenting fulfillment in our lives. Marx would view a relationship between religious belief and progressive social activism as a display of a dehumanized society intense for self actualization. The people of a progressive social activist society are not getting self actualization because there political administration allows for scarcity of necessities, goods and jobs, and they also oppress the people of their society.According to Marx, if people are without self actualization they will create a place where they can find self actualization. Religion helps people do that. Durkheim dedicated a considerable part of his a cademic life to the study of religion especially religion in small scale traditional societies. Allotting a single sentence to Durkheim in a kind of appendix to The Sacred & The Profane, Eliade comments that the French instituteer of sociology believed that he had found the sociological explanation for religion in totemism.Durkheim bases his work on the totemism practiced by Australian aborigines and argues that totemism is the most elementary or simple form of religion. Durkheim starts Forms by looking at how religion may be defined and here the heavenly profane dichotomy comes immediately into play the primary characteristic of religion is that it divides the world into the two domains of sacred and profane. In fact, the two are opposed so fundamentally that they are seen as separate worlds. In Durkheims view the sacred is far from being synonymous with the divine.Not only may gods and spirits be sacred, but also things like rocks, trees, pieces of wood, in fact anything. For wh at makes something sacred is not that it is somehow connected to the divine but that it is the subject of a prohibition that sets it radically apart from something else, which is itself thereby made profane. Durkheim describes religion in monetary value of beliefs and rites. For him, the details of these in particular religions are particular ways of dealing in thought and action with the fundamental dichotomy of sacred and profane.

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Show on a Diagram How a Monopoly Firm Will Make Supernormal Profits by Restricting Ouput

Show on a diagram how a monopoly firm will defy supernormal meshwork by restricting output. Discuss how the theory of contestable marts could impact on the price and output of a monopoly. Neo-classical theory defines monopoly as a market structure where one dominant firm supplies most or all output in the labor without facing competition because of high barriers to instauration to the manufacturing. The monopolist is a con leech profit maximiser and due to the demand under a monopoly being moderately inelastic at any effrontery price, the monopolist is said to be a price give riser, unlike perfect competition where the firms are price takers.The diagram below shows the monopoly making supernormal profits by restricting output. The equilibrium profit maximising level of output is 0A where MC = MR, and price will be 0p. Supernormal profits are made, shown by the area on the diagram shaded red. If profit maximisation was not an objective for a monopoly, it might produce at the bottom of its average costs foreshorten (AC). Thus, price being lower than P and quantity produced would be greater. However, because a monopoly is partly defined by wanting to profit maximise in the short run, this is not the case. C AC Price Quantity mR p A Demand 0 Under perfect competition, supernormal profits canister solely be made in the short run, due to low barriers to entry. The monopolist can earn supernormal profit in the short and long run due to not having to produce at the bottom of the AC curve and having high barriers to entry. These barriers to entry, preventing other potential new entrance from coming in and competing with the monopoly can take various forms. Perhaps the monopoly has control over the source of an essential raw material.Perhaps the monopoly has extremely strong brand loyalty and takes great wish well to protect its brand image and the loyalty of its consumers through extensive marketing. It has been shown that neo-classical theory suggests that high barriers to entry will earn supernormal profits for a monopoly. contestable market theory, in which states that there is freedom of entry to the industry and where costs of exit are low, suggests that a monopoly will earn supernormal profits bloodsucking to a large extent on the costs of exit from the industry.If the costs of exit from the industry are low, then the monopoly arguably wont make supernormal profits in the long run. If a monopoly in the short run is charging high prices and earning supernormal profit, a antagonist will enter the industry and take some market share from the monopolist by charging a lower price. The monopolist will react by reducing prices, forcing the new competitor out of the industry. This happens because the competitor cannot compete with the new lower prices set by the monopolist due to its costs being too high.Thus, if the costs of exit from the industry are low, it is worth the competitor entering the market and having earned supernormal p rofits in the short run. Though, once the competitor has left the industry and the monopolist raises its price again wanting to earn supernormal profits, another competitor will enter the industry reducing the monopolists overall profits and taking market share away from it. Clearly the only way to avoid potential competitors from adopting hit and run tactics would be for the monopolist to price at a level where it only earned normal profits.In the long run the monopolist will increase output and decrease price, operating at the optimal level of output where MC = AC. Thus in conclusion it has been shown that a monopoly will make supernormal profits by restricting output. The monopoly chooses the output level to produce at, and wanting to profit maximise, it produces at the point where marginal costs equals marginal revenue. In contestable market theory, the established firm, the monopoly, must behave as if it operates in a perfectly competitive market to prevent hit and run tactics by potential competitors, producing where MC = AC.

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Project Scope Somplete Kitchen Remodel Essay

Business RequirementsA complete kitchen remodel is proposed and allow be located at Sponsor Representatives residence. telescopeThe residence leave contain new cabinets, countertops, flooring and hardware that will update current kitchen in existing materials and result in major investiture increase of the value and marketability for resaleBusiness OpportunityAn analysis based on interviews and inspection of the Sponsor Representatives residence revealed that the current kitchen is outdated. The remodel will update the kitchen and increase the value of the residence.Business Objectives and Success CriteriaThe success of this project is the establishment of a new kitchen within the budget of thirty thousand dollars in the three months allocated. The kitchen remodel must be visually appealing and be functional upon completion.Customer or Market NeedsBusiness RisksWithout the kitchen remodel, it will be impossible to increase kitchen investment value. Another risk is the financial ri sk of the investment itself due to loss of market value.Vision of the SolutionThe new kitchen will be used to cook everyday meals and also host events.Vision StatementThe new kitchen will be used in the future to host events and increase the value of the residence.Assumptions and Dependencies NoneLimitations and Exclusions NoneStakeholder ProfilesDimensionDrivers ConstraintDegree of FreedomSchedule Complete inThree Months________________________________________FeaturesUpdated Cabinets________________________________________QualityQuality Cabinets Cost of Materials ________________________________________Staff Five PM Students Outsourcing Contractors________________________________________Cost calculate of 30KProject PrioritiesStakeholderMajor Value Attributes Major InterestsConstraints ________________________________________Updated KitchenIncreased Value Time of Max budgetTo ResidenceCompletion of 30KOperating EnvironmentThe homeowner will be responsible for utilities used tempo rary hookup completing the project.

Friday, May 24, 2019

Michigan School for the Deaf Essay

Through the years the take has faced many challenges such as funding, maintenance, up keep of advancing technology and enrollment. The single nearly important issue is funding with let out funding there would be no residential school for the deaf(p) nipperren and the would be forced to be mainstreamed into worldly concern school. I propose that p arnts should be t elderly about Michigan tutor for the deaf. Driving mow Miller Road in Flint, Michigan and you atomic number 18 probably query what the old buildings standing there be for and what came about to how the school Michigan School for the Deaf became about?I depart help you better understand. MSD was started in 1848, nonwithstanding it did not start out as MSD. Heck, they didnt even live what they were going to call it or where it was going to be located, they just knew the deaf and blind needed a school to go to as fountainhead as normal students. A State Legislature Governor Ransom, who just so happened to be the governor at the time, wanted to give the idea of having a joint school for the deaf and dumb and blind. A guy by the pretend of E. H. Thomson proposed a bill to establish an institution called Michigan Asylum for Educating the deaf and dumb and blind.The bill was later enacted into a law and signed April 3rd, 1848. It took a technical 28 years to arise a school started. In the 1820s a state sponsored school was proposed to be established in Detroit, Michigan but it was never materialized. A few students who were blind were taught in a preparatory school at the University of Michigan located in Romeo, Michigan during the 1840s. Children in the 1840s were not educated in programs, Michigan did not send deaf and blind students to schools like many other states were practicing.Vill be ons of Flint, Romeo, and Kalamazoo extended offers of donations of land, cash, and building materials. In November 1849, the card selected the proposed site for the hospital for the insane and the als o the proposed for the school. The hospital was to be located in Kalamazoo and the school was in Flint. The funding law was passed in 1848, but because of fiscal difficulties the school did not start until 1854. In the year of 1851 the board voiced the idea to joint the deaf and blind because having a separate school was out of the question.They proposed the idea of having of having erected class rooms suitable and separate for the deaf and blind. Students who could apply the school financially, were the suitable age, and had the strength would board in the Village of Flint, the students who couldnt afford were accommodated under the charge of the Principle. The month of November in 1853 the board offered Reverend Barnabas Maynard Fay the position of Principle. Fay had previous experience as a teacher at Indiana foot for the Blind and the Institution for Deaf and unsounded in New York.January 1854, Fay was appointed and the school was to open February 1, 1854 in Flint. February 6 , 1854 the first student was enrolled, April 18, 1854 it was reported they had 12 students, 11 deaf mute and one and only(a) blind. Thirteen years later an act was passed to change the name of Michigan Asylum to Michigan Institution for Educating the Dead and Dumb and the Blind. In 1879, the blind were separated the school for the blind from the school for the deaf. In 1887 Michigan School for the Deaf was given, not sure what year Michigan School for the Blind was relocated to Lansing, Michigan.As of 1937 MSD became jurisdiction of the State Board of Education and still remains to this day. (deaftartars. com) You may be wondering why I am writing a proposal for MSD when I am neither deaf or blind. Its a simple answer, family. My grandpa is a Tartar alumni, existence deaf mute and completely blind. He was not always blind, but he has been deaf since the day he was born. My family moved from Arkansas to Michigan for the school. You atomic number 18 probably once again thinking, ar e you guys crazy?No, we are not, they just wanted best from their highly intelligent son. A flowerpot of people destroy deaf and blind individuals, they see them as being different from us so they automatically call them dumb. It hurts when I hear these individuals being called that because I know first hand that they are not anywhere near that. They deal to retain a bunch of knowledge in their brain as well as us, but the difference they have to use their hands where we use are mouths. It is an even harder task because just like us they have to con different languages also.You are probably rightfully confused as to how a deaf and blind someone communicates am I right? I will inform you, it is a lot harder then a regular deaf individual. They use what is called tactile sign language, it is when the person talking takes the other persons hand and signs into the thread of the hand, but only using one hand most of the time. Luckily, my grandpa was one of the lucky was to get a great education considering there are a lot of them that are not as lucky example, Matt Hamill. Matt Hamill, found out at a very young age that he was profoundly deaf.His grandfather would not let him go to a school that would help him better learn how to communicate with every day people. He became a star wrestler, even got into Purdue University. Soon to be kicked out because he was not taught sign language and could not comprehend what the interrupters were saying to him, let alone(predicate) what they were doing. Matt later went to Rochester College of Technology (RTC). There he learned everything he needed to know and became a National Champion Wrestler. Michigan School for the Deaf, is not only for deaf students.MSD is also a school of choice for anyone, but it definitely an expensive school. Tuition is $30,600 and for the resident intermediate school regularize it is $9,500. galore(postnominal) parents of deaf baberen do not know that there is a school for deaf children, reasoning why enrollment is down and why MSD does not have a lot of funding. (The Hammer) The amount of enrollment for MSD has gone down so far over the years which is causing some major funding for the school. everyday schools get $9,000 for each deaf student that is enrolled into their school district.Most of the students and their parents do not even know that Michigan School for the Deaf even exist. I believe in order to get funding up at MSD a group of people need to go from school district to school across Michigan and have an assembly or a benefit for these parents. They butt sit down and talk about what can happen at Michigan School for the Deaf for their child, why it is a better ideal school for their child to go to, and why their school district will not tell them about MSD. I bet you didnt know that for every deaf child a public school has they get $9,000, that is $9,000 that MSD does not et because if that child leaves the district to go to MSD that district loses tha t money and has to give it to MSD. Deaf culture is a very hard culture to understand. A lot of time learning their language and learning how they have to learn is a very hard way. Its not easy teaching a deaf child math. You have to make sure you never mix the numbers up or how you sign a very long equation. The public school really isnt using the money other then to pay an interrupter for each deaf child that is at that school. They get paid anywhere from $30-$70/hour.For one week of a school year saying that the child attends school for 35 hours that week, that interrupter earns $2,450 just one week So in all money plant that school is losing money rather then gaining it from/for that child. Even fundraisers for the school would help. Like do a huge sporting event, say that Powers Catholic football squad plays a huge game there and half the proceeds go to MSD or even showing movies like The Hammer and paying three dollars to sentry it and having snacks where all the proceeds go to the school.I just think that more parents need to know that Michigan School for the Deaf is there so that their child gets a better education for their situation. If Michigan School for the Deaf does not get their funding up they are going to have to shut down and main stream all of their students into public schools. I believe that every parent with a deaf child is a very lucky parent. My grandparents are both deaf and they are highly intelligent. My grandpa is deaf and blind he is what people call the wooden toy maker. He carves fire trucks, old ford trucks, helicopters, and trains out of wood.He has been doing this 1991. my grandpa has no idea what we look like but he knows its us by a simple motion of hi in his hand or a handshake. A lot of people I know call deaf people dumb, but they are far from that. I bet if every person got a chance to have a conversation one to one with a deaf person they would think completely different of how they see each person. They are unique i n their own way just like every other person in this world. I think it is amazing how they have a school to go to for their environment as well as we have one for ours. I think taking that away from them is cruel and horrible.Having a child that is deaf is a remarkable thing, do not let something that has been around for years be taken away because someone can afford to keep it up and running. This state needs to understand that they have a historical building in their hands, they need to figure out a way to keep it up and running. Remember, No Child Left Behind. Work Cited Michigan School for the Deaf. January 2011. December 2011 . Debbie Jenkins. private interview. December 2011. Harold Riley. Personal interview. December 2011. The Hammer. Dir. Oren Kapal. Perf. Russell Harvard, Raymond J. Barry, and Shoshannah Stern. 2011. Film.